Show simple item record

dc.contributor.otherHeinOnline
dc.creatorSchafer, Lindsay
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-30T21:09:28Z
dc.date.available2018-11-30T21:09:28Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10898/9469
dc.descriptionCasenote
dc.languageEnglish
dc.publisherMercer University: Walter F. George School of Law
dc.subject.classificationFees
dc.subject.classificationPlaintiffs
dc.subject.classificationWater
dc.subject.classificationEnvironment
dc.titleMercer Law Review Vol. 064 Issue 04-056 pg. 1111 - The Positive Effect Escape Hatch: The Eleventh Circuit's New View of the Catalyst Theory and the Resulting Difficulty for Plaintiffs to Receive Attorney Fees
dc.typeText
dcterms.bibliographicCitation64 Mercer L. Rev. 1111 (Summer 2013)
refterms.dateFOA2020-09-29T13:42:13Z
dc.format.issue4
dc.format.startpage1111
dc.format.volume64


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
60_64MercerLRev1111(Summer2013).pdf
Size:
1.088Mb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record