Show simple item record

dc.contributor.otherHeinOnline
dc.creatorImwinkelried, Edward J.
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-30T21:08:13Z
dc.date.available2018-11-30T21:08:13Z
dc.date.issued2011
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10898/9314
dc.descriptionThe Brain Sciences in the Courtroom: A Symposium of the Mercer Law Review
dc.languageEnglish
dc.publisherMercer University: Walter F. George School of Law
dc.subject.classificationTestimony
dc.subject.classificationPsychiatry and Psychology
dc.titleMercer Law Review Vol. 062 Issue 03-045 pg. 0959 - Serendipitous Timing: The Coincidental Emergence of the New Brain Science and the Advent of an Epistemological Approach to Determining the Admissibility of Expert Testimony
dc.typeText
dcterms.bibliographicCitation62 Mercer L. Rev. 959 (2010-2011)
refterms.dateFOA2020-09-29T13:42:13Z
dc.format.issue3
dc.format.startpage959
dc.format.volume62


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
48_62MercerLRev959(2010-2011).pdf
Size:
1.667Mb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record