Show simple item record

dc.contributor.otherHeinOnline
dc.creatorHarbinson, Tom
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-30T21:05:35Z
dc.date.available2018-11-30T21:05:35Z
dc.date.issued2007
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10898/9018
dc.descriptionArticle
dc.languageEnglish
dc.publisherMercer University: Walter F. George School of Law
dc.subject.classificationCriminal Law and Procedure
dc.subject.classificationEvidence
dc.titleMercer Law Review Vol. 058 Issue 02-027 pg. 0569 - Crawford v. Washington and Davis v. Washington's Originalism: Historical Arguments Showing Child Abuse Victims' Statements to Physicians Are Nontestimonial and Admissible as an Exception to the Confrontation Clause
dc.typeText
dcterms.bibliographicCitation58 Mercer L. Rev. 569 (2006-2007)
refterms.dateFOA2020-09-29T13:42:11Z
dc.format.issue2
dc.format.startpage569
dc.format.volume58


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
29_58MercerLRev569(2006-2007).pdf
Size:
4.312Mb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record