Show simple item record

dc.contributor.otherHeinOnline
dc.creatorSwann, Jerre B.
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-30T20:03:54Z
dc.date.available2018-11-30T20:03:54Z
dc.date.issued1982
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10898/7110
dc.descriptionSpecial Contribution
dc.languageEnglish
dc.publisherMercer University: Walter F. George School of Law
dc.subject.classificationDilution Laws
dc.subject.classificationTrademarks
dc.subject.classificationEvidence
dc.subject.classificationIntellectual Property
dc.titleMercer Law Review Vol. 033 Issue 04-066 pg. 1205 - Bald Protectionism or a Balanced Review: A Reply to Lunsford and Cohrs
dc.typeText
dcterms.bibliographicCitation33 Mercer L. Rev. 1205 (1981-1982)
refterms.dateFOA2020-09-29T13:41:54Z
dc.format.issue4
dc.format.startpage1205
dc.format.volume33


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
70_33MercerLRev1205(1981-1982).pdf
Size:
876.6Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record